Motorola Razr 40 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Motorola Razr 40 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 71/100 vs 56/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 840,330); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.9mm vs 7.4mm).
Motorola Razr 40
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 199g
- Better display (91/100 vs 81/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 840330
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1039
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2885
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 55/100)
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 34/100)
- Better portability (76/100 vs 73/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 15 points higher (71/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (45/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (45/100 vs 34/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Motorola Razr 40 are nearly equal (76/100 vs 73/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 840330 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1039 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2885 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1828x2584 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.4 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Motorola Razr 40
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Razr 40
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1828x2584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 40
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 40 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Motorola Razr 40 by 73.1% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (92/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (45/100 vs 34/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Motorola Razr 40 are nearly equal (76/100 vs 73/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 40 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Motorola Razr 40 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 71/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (92/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Motorola Razr 40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.