Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 74/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 3,057,215); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably lighter (201g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Better camera (91/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 3057215
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9119
- Lighter: 201g vs 285g
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 90/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 9 points higher (83/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (98/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (91/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (68/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (74/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 11047 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Motorola Razr Fold by 22.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (98/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (91/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (68/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (74/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.