Apple iPhone 16 vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Apple iPhone 16 (2024) runs on the Apple A18, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $799 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 86/100 vs 68/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3561); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,822,701); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 147); the Apple iPhone 16 is noticeably lighter (170g vs 285g).
Apple iPhone 16
Motorola Razr Fold
- Lighter: 170g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $1799
- Better portability (79/100 vs 52/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1822701
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 7700
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3561 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 25W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 83/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 78/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 61/100)
Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 18 points higher (86/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (98/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (71/100 vs 24/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 16 — 48/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 76/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (98/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (81/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (71/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (79/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1822701 | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3100 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7700 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.1" Super Retina XDR OLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2556x1179 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3561 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 147 | 164 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 147.6×71.6×7.8 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 170 g | 285 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | $1799 |
Apple iPhone 16
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Apple iPhone 16
- 6.1" Super Retina XDR OLED
- Resolution: 2556x1179
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Apple iPhone 16
- 3561 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- Wireless: 25W
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Apple iPhone 16 and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Apple iPhone 16 by 53.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1000. Apple iPhone 16 was $1000 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (98/100 vs 83/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (81/100 vs 61/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (71/100 vs 24/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (79/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 16 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Apple iPhone 16 has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16 or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 83/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Apple iPhone 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.