Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs Motorola Razr Fold

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro (2025) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 79/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3998); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 2,538,751); per DXOMark lab testing, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro has the stronger camera (168 vs 164); the Apple iPhone 17 Pro is noticeably lighter (206g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Apple iPhone 17 Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Performance 92
Display 85
Camera 94
Battery 37
Portability 47
Value for money 68

Motorola Razr Fold

Performance 90
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 68
Portability 52
Value for money 74

What makes Apple iPhone 17 Pro better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3895 vs 2833
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9988 vs 9119
  • Lighter: 206g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 90/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better display (85/100 vs 81/100)

What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 2538751
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3998 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 40W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 25W

  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 47/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 4 points higher (83/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 17 Pro — 68/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro (68/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 47/100).

Apple iPhone 17 Pro: The Apple iPhone 17 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Apple iPhone 17 Pro Motorola Razr Fold
Processor Apple A19 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
AnTuTu 2538751 3057215
Geekbench Single 3895 2833
Geekbench Multi 9988 9119
Display 6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2622x1206 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3998 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 40W 68W
Wireless charging 25W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 168 164
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 10 MP
Front camera 18 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS iOS 26 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IPX9
Dimensions 150.0×71.9×8.8 mm 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 206 g 285 g
Launch price $1099 $1799

Camera comparison

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

  • Main: 48MP f/1.78
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 18MP
94
camera

Motorola Razr Fold

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera

Display comparison

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

  • 6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 2622x1206
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

  • 3998 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 9:51 hrs, total 26:48 hrs
  • Wired: 40W
  • Wireless: 25W
37
battery

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 17 Pro and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro
79/100
2538751 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
83/100 +17.0%
3057215 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Apple iPhone 17 Pro by 17.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

$1099

Motorola Razr Fold

$1799

Launch price difference: $700. Apple iPhone 17 Pro was $700 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro (68/100 vs 37/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 47/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Apple iPhone 17 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Apple iPhone 17 Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 17 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 17 Pro over the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.