Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro (2025) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1099 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro leads — 79/100 vs 76/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 3998); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 2,590,000); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.8mm).

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Performance 92
Display 85
Camera 94
Battery 37
Portability 47
Value for money 70
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 64
What makes Apple iPhone 17 Pro better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3895 vs 3041
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9988 vs 9494

  • Better camera (94/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better value for money (70/100 vs 64/100)
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 2590000
  • Bigger battery: 4700 vs 3998 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 40W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 199g vs 206g

  • Longer battery life (58/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 47/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro scores 3 points higher (79/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro leads (94/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (94/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro (58/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro (68/100 vs 47/100). In the "value for money" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro is a bit better (70/100 vs 64/100).

Apple iPhone 17 Pro: The Apple iPhone 17 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Apple iPhone 17 Pro Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Processor Apple A19 Pro Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2590000 3113462
Geekbench Single 3895 3041
Geekbench Multi 9988 9494
Display 6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 7.0" pOLED
Resolution 2622x1206 1224x2912
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 3998 mAh 4700 mAh
Charging 40W 68W
Wireless charging 25W 30W
DXOMark (camera) 168
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 0 MP
Front camera 18 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS iOS 26 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP48
Dimensions 150.0×71.9×8.8 mm 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm
Weight 206 g 199 g
Price $1099 $1099
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.78
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 18MP
94
camera
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
  • 6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 2622x1206
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
  • 3998 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 9:51 hrs, total 26:48 hrs
  • Wired: 40W
  • Wireless: 25W
37
battery
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 17 Pro and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro
79/100
2590000 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100 +16.8%
3113462 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Apple iPhone 17 Pro by 16.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
$1099
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
$1099

Price difference: $0. Same price.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (94/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro (58/100 vs 37/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro (68/100 vs 47/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro is a bit better (70/100 vs 64/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 17 Pro or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 17 Pro and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 76/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 17 Pro or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 17 Pro over the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.