Apple iPhone 17e vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

The Apple iPhone 17e (2026) runs on the Apple A19, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $599 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 59/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 3600); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 2,156,126); the Apple iPhone 17e is noticeably lighter (163g vs 199g).

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 17e — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 17e
Performance 89
Display 61
Camera 34
Battery 21
Portability 83
Value for money 30
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 64
What makes Apple iPhone 17e better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3692 vs 3041
  • Lighter: 163g vs 199g
  • Cheaper: $599 vs $1099

  • Better portability (83/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 2156126
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 9454
  • Bigger battery: 4700 vs 3600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 20W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 60Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better camera (57/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (58/100 vs 21/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better value for money (64/100 vs 30/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 17e vs the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 17 points higher (76/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 21/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (64/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Apple iPhone 17e are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (94/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (57/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (58/100 vs 21/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 17e notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (83/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (64/100 vs 30/100).

Apple iPhone 17e: The Apple iPhone 17e is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Apple iPhone 17e Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Processor Apple A19 Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2156126 3113462
Geekbench Single 3692 3041
Geekbench Multi 9454 9494
Display 6.1" OLED 7.0" pOLED
Resolution 2556x1179 1224x2912
Refresh rate 60 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 3600 mAh 4700 mAh
Charging 20W 68W
Wireless charging 15W 30W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 24 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS iOS 19 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP48
Dimensions 146.7×71.5×7.8 mm 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm
Weight 163 g 199 g
Price $599 $1099
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 17e
  • Main: 48MP f/1.6
  • Front: 24MP
34
camera
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 17e
  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 2556x1179
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
61
display
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 17e
  • 3600 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • Wireless: 15W
21
battery
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 17e and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19
59/100
2156126 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100 +30.7%
3113462 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Apple iPhone 17e by 30.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Apple iPhone 17e
$599
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
$1099

Price difference: $500. Apple iPhone 17e is cheaper by $500.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Apple iPhone 17e are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (94/100 vs 61/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (57/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (58/100 vs 21/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 17e notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (83/100 vs 68/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (64/100 vs 30/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 17e or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 17e — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 17e and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?

The Apple iPhone 17e has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 76/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 17e or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 34/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 17e over the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?

The Apple iPhone 17e is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.