Apple iPhone 17e vs Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

The Apple iPhone 17e (2026) runs on the Apple A19, while the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $599 and $1499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 59/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3600); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 2,156,126); the Apple iPhone 17e is noticeably lighter (163g vs 199g).

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 17e — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Apple iPhone 17e

Performance 89
Display 61
Camera 34
Battery 21
Portability 83
Value for money 32

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

Performance 92
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 64
Portability 68
Value for money 66

What makes Apple iPhone 17e better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3692 vs 3013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9454 vs 9287
  • Lighter: 163g vs 199g
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $1499

  • Better portability (83/100 vs 68/100)

What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 2156126
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 20W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 60Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better camera (60/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (64/100 vs 21/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 61/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 17e vs the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 19 points higher (78/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 21/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 17e — 32/100, Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Apple iPhone 17e are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (95/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (60/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (64/100 vs 21/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 17e notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (83/100 vs 68/100).

Apple iPhone 17e: The Apple iPhone 17e is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Apple iPhone 17e Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Processor Apple A19 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2156126 3379591
Geekbench Single 3692 3013
Geekbench Multi 9454 9287
Display 6.1" OLED 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2556x1179 1224x2992
Refresh rate 60 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 3600 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 20W 68W
Wireless charging 15W 30W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 24 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 512GB
OS iOS 19 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits 5000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP48
Dimensions 146.7×71.5×7.8 mm 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm
Weight 163 g 199 g
Launch price $599 $1499

Camera comparison

Apple iPhone 17e

  • Main: 48MP f/1.6
  • Front: 24MP
34
camera

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera

Display comparison

Apple iPhone 17e

  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 2556x1179
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
61
display

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display

Battery and charging

Apple iPhone 17e

  • 3600 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • Wireless: 15W
21
battery

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
64
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 17e and Motorola Razr Ultra 2026, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19
59/100
2156126 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
78/100 +36.2%
3379591 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Apple iPhone 17e by 36.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Apple iPhone 17e

$599

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

$1499

Launch price difference: $900. Apple iPhone 17e was $900 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Apple iPhone 17e are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (95/100 vs 61/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (60/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (64/100 vs 21/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 17e notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (83/100 vs 68/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Apple iPhone 17e or the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 17e — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 17e and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026?

The Apple iPhone 17e has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 78/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 17e or the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 34/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 17e over the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026?

The Apple iPhone 17e is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.