Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 74/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 3,379,591); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 7.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 201g
- Better camera (60/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 3379591
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 92/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 4 points higher (78/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (98/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (95/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 11047 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 by 14.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (98/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (95/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 92/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.