OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $661 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 69/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 2,926,532); the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is thinner (8.2mm vs 12.9mm).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 2926532
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Cheaper: $661 vs $2899
- Better camera (94/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 42/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2680
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 8358
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 89/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 17 points higher (86/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (84/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (83/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (54/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (84/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 309 g | |
| Price | $661 | $2899 |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 5.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2238. OPPO Reno 16 Pro is cheaper by $2238.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (83/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (54/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (84/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.