OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 71/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 3,079,298); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.9mm vs 8.2mm).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (94/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 3079298
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2680
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 8358
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (76/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 15 points higher (86/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (83/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (76/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1828x2584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 199 g | |
| Price | $661 | — |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1828x2584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads OPPO Reno 16 Pro by 1.3% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (94/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (83/100 vs 45/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (76/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.