Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs Vivo X300s

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 71/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 3,119,308); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably lighter (199g vs 217g).

The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Performance 92
Display 81
Camera 50
Battery 45
Portability 76
Value for money
Vivo X300s
Performance 94
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 90
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
  • Lighter: 199g vs 217g

  • Better portability (76/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 3119308
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 3041
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 9494
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 4800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 92/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 50/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 45/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 18 points higher (89/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (83/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (76/100 vs 42/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide Vivo X300s
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3119308 3703823
Geekbench Single 3041 3228
Geekbench Multi 9494 9553
Display 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1828x2584 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4800 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
NFC yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm
Weight 199 g 217 g
Price $723
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
50
camera
Vivo X300s
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
  • Resolution: 1828x2584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Vivo X300s
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
45
battery
Vivo X300s
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100
3119308 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +15.8%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide by 15.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknown
Vivo X300s
$723
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (94/100 vs 50/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (83/100 vs 45/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (76/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 50/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide over the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.