Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Poco F7 Ultra
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro (2024) runs on the Apple A18 Pro, while the Poco F7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $999 and $500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Ultra leads — 82/100 vs 73/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Ultra has the bigger battery (5300 mAh vs 3582); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco F7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,932,885 vs 1,782,199).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Poco F7 Ultra
What makes Apple iPhone 16 Pro better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3400 vs 3013
- Lighter: 199g vs 212g
- Better camera (86/100 vs 71/100)
- Better portability (56/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Poco F7 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2932885 vs 1782199
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 8300
- Bigger battery: 5300 vs 3582 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 25W
- Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $999
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 85/100)
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs the Poco F7 Ultra, the Poco F7 Ultra scores 9 points higher (82/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads (86/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 24/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 16 Pro — 56/100, Poco F7 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 85/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (86/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (84/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a bit better (56/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Poco F7 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1782199 | 2932885 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3400 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8300 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2622x1206 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3582 mAh | 5300 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 149.6×71.5×8.3 mm | 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $999 | $500 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/1.78
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 12MP
Poco F7 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED
- Resolution: 2622x1206
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 3582 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- Wireless: 25W
Poco F7 Ultra
- 5300 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:39 hrs, total 26:17 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone 16 Pro and Poco F7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 Ultra leads Apple iPhone 16 Pro by 39.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $499. Poco F7 Ultra was $499 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 85/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (86/100 vs 71/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (84/100 vs 24/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a bit better (56/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Ultra edges out the Apple iPhone 16 Pro by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Poco F7 Ultra — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads on camera score (86/100 vs 71/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Ultra leads on performance (90/100 vs 85/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro over the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.