Apple iPhone Fold vs Poco F7 Ultra
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Poco F7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Ultra leads — 82/100 vs 77/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco F7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,932,885 vs 2,538,751).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Poco F7 Ultra
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 9287
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 90/100)
What makes Poco F7 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2932885 vs 2538751
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (71/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Poco F7 Ultra, the Poco F7 Ultra scores 5 points higher (82/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (71/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Poco F7 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (71/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Poco F7 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 2932885 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 9287 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 5300 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | — | 212 g | |
| Launch price | — | $500 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Poco F7 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Poco F7 Ultra
- 5300 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:39 hrs, total 26:17 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Poco F7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 Ultra leads Apple iPhone Fold by 13.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Poco F7 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (71/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Ultra edges out the Apple iPhone Fold by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Poco F7 Ultra — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Ultra leads on camera score (71/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.