Apple iPhone Fold vs Poco F9 Pro
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Poco F9 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F9 Pro leads — 84/100 vs 77/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,228,426 vs 2,538,751).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Poco F9 Pro
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 3639
- Overall rating 77/100
What makes Poco F9 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3228426 vs 2538751
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10558
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (74/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Poco F9 Pro, the Poco F9 Pro scores 7 points higher (84/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (74/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (95/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (74/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Poco F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 3228426 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 11047 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 1156x2510 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 185 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 6330 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 157.5×75.3×8.8 mm | |
| Weight | — | 206 g | |
| Launch price | — | $699 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Poco F9 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F9 Pro
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1156x2510
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Poco F9 Pro
- 6330 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Poco F9 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F9 Pro leads Apple iPhone Fold by 21.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (95/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (74/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Poco F9 Pro?
The Poco F9 Pro edges out the Apple iPhone Fold by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Poco F9 Pro?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Poco F9 Pro — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Poco F9 Pro?
The Poco F9 Pro leads on camera score (74/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Poco F9 Pro?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco F9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.