Apple iPhone Fold vs Poco F7 Pro
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 77/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Apple iPhone Fold is faster in AnTuTu (2,538,751 vs 2,301,212).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Poco F7 Pro
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2538751 vs 2301212
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 9287
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 87/100)
What makes Poco F7 Pro better?
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (67/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Poco F7 Pro, the Poco F7 Pro scores 3 points higher (80/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (67/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold is a bit better (92/100 vs 87/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (67/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Poco F7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 2301212 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 9287 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | — | 220 g | |
| Launch price | — | $499 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Poco F7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Poco F7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Poco F7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Apple iPhone Fold leads Poco F7 Pro by 10.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold is a bit better (92/100 vs 87/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (67/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro edges out the Apple iPhone Fold by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Poco F7 Pro?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Poco F7 Pro — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro leads on camera score (67/100 vs 53/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Apple iPhone Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 87/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Poco F7 Pro?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.