Apple iPhone Fold vs Poco F9 Ultra
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Poco F9 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F9 Ultra leads — 90/100 vs 77/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F9 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,165,108 vs 2,538,751).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Poco F9 Ultra
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 3639
- Overall rating 77/100
What makes Poco F9 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4165108 vs 2538751
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10558
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (90/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Poco F9 Ultra, the Poco F9 Ultra scores 13 points higher (90/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Ultra is a bit better (98/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (90/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Poco F9 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 4165108 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 11047 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.9" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 185 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 8050 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.5×78.0×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | — | 238 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Poco F9 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F9 Ultra
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Poco F9 Ultra
- 8050 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Poco F9 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F9 Ultra leads Apple iPhone Fold by 39.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Ultra is a bit better (98/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (90/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Poco F9 Ultra is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone Fold — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Poco F9 Ultra — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Poco F9 Ultra leads on camera score (90/100 vs 53/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Poco F9 Ultra leads on performance (98/100 vs 92/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco F9 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.