Poco F7 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Poco F7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $500 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 82/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5300); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 2,932,885).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F7 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Poco F7 Ultra better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 212g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $899
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (48/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 2932885
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5300 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 71/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F7 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 6 points higher (88/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 71/100). Value score: Poco F7 Ultra — 86/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Poco F7 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F7 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2932885 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5300 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 212 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $500 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Poco F7 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco F7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F7 Ultra
- 5300 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:39 hrs, total 26:17 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F7 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Poco F7 Ultra by 11.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $399. Poco F7 Ultra was $399 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Poco F7 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (96/100 vs 71/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F7 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Poco F7 Ultra by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco F7 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Poco F7 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Poco F7 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.