Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Poco F7
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro (2024) runs on the Apple A18 Pro, while the Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4; estimated prices are $1164 and $404. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads — 73/100 vs 66/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 3582); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco F7 is faster in AnTuTu (2,205,289 vs 1,870,000); the Apple iPhone 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 215g).
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Poco F7
- Better Geekbench Single: 3400 vs 2070
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8300 vs 6694
- Lighter: 199g vs 215g
- Higher performance (85/100 vs 81/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 83/100)
- Better portability (56/100 vs 48/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2205289 vs 1870000
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 3582 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Cheaper: $404 vs $1164
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 24/100)
- Better value for money (70/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs the Poco F7, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro scores 7 points higher (73/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads (86/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 leads (68/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 leads (70/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (86/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (68/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a bit better (56/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (70/100 vs 56/100).
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Poco F7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 1870000 | 2205289 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3400 | 2070 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8300 | 6694 | |
| Display | 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2622x1206 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3582 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 149.6×71.5×8.3 mm | 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 215 g | |
| Price | $1164 | $404 |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.78
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 12MP
Poco F7
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED
- Resolution: 2622x1206
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 3582 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- Wireless: 25W
Poco F7
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Apple iPhone 16 Pro and Poco F7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 leads Apple iPhone 16 Pro by 15.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $760. Poco F7 is cheaper by $760.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (86/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (68/100 vs 24/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a bit better (56/100 vs 48/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (70/100 vs 56/100).
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Poco F7?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro edges out the Poco F7 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Poco F7?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Poco F7 — 66/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Poco F7?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads on camera score (86/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro over the Poco F7?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.