Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 74/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,950,082); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably lighter (201g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Lighter: 201g vs 230g
- Better portability (74/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3950082
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 98/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 17 points higher (91/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (99/100 vs 98/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (74/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3950082 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 11047 | |
| Display | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1828x2448 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 17 / One UI 9 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide by 7.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (99/100 vs 98/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (96/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (85/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (74/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.