Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 71/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 3,119,308); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 199g vs 226g
- Better portability (76/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 3119308
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 16 points higher (87/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (81/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (76/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9553 | |
| Display | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1828x2584 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 226 g | |
| Price | — | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1828x2584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide by 4.6% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (96/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (81/100 vs 45/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (76/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.