Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 74/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 3,326,259); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably lighter (201g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 3326259
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3293
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10243
- Lighter: 201g vs 226g
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 94/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 14 points higher (88/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (98/100 vs 94/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (96/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (74/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3950082 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 10243 | |
| Display | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1828x2448 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 17 / One UI 9 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Vivo X300 Pro by 18.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (98/100 vs 94/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (96/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (81/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (74/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.