Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Vivo X300s
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1999 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 75/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 4400); the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 3,065,623).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Vivo X300s
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?
- Lighter: 215g vs 217g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 3065623
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2910
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 9174
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper at launch: $723 vs $1999
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 14 points higher (89/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100, Vivo X300s — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (95/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (83/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (66/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3065623 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2910 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9174 | 10243 | |
| Display | 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2184x1968 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 145 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 215 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | $1999 | $723 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2184x1968
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by 17.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1276. Vivo X300s was $1276 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (95/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (83/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (66/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Vivo X300s?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 over the Vivo X300s?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.