Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo X300s

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1299 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 79/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 2,800,202).

The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Performance 91
Display 88
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 46
Value for money 66
Vivo X300s
Performance 94
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 90
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 9553

  • Better portability (46/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 2800202
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 3100
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 217g vs 218g
  • Cheaper at launch: $723 vs $1299

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 81/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 88/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 10 points higher (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 66/100, Vivo X300s — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (83/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo X300s are nearly equal (46/100 vs 42/100).

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Vivo X300s
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 2800202 3703823
Geekbench Single 3100 3228
Geekbench Multi 9760 9553
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 151
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / One UI 7 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm
Weight 218 g 217 g
Launch price $1299 $723
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
81
camera
Vivo X300s
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
Vivo X300s
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery
Vivo X300s
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
79/100
2800202 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +24.4%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by 24.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
$1299
Vivo X300s
$723

Launch price difference: $576. Vivo X300s was $576 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (83/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo X300s are nearly equal (46/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 81/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra over the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.