OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $661 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 72/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,079,298).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Cheaper: $661 vs $1999
- Better camera (94/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 44/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 48/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3079298
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2680
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 8358
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 89/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 14 points higher (86/100 vs 72/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (84/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a bit better (98/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 44/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (84/100 vs 48/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1968x2184 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | — | 215 g | |
| Price | $661 | $1999 |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads OPPO Reno 16 Pro by 21.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1338. OPPO Reno 16 Pro is cheaper by $1338.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a bit better (98/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (94/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (83/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 44/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (84/100 vs 48/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — 72/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads on performance (98/100 vs 89/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.