OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $661 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 75/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4400); the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 3,065,623); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is thinner (4.2mm vs 8.2mm).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 3065623
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Cheaper: $661 vs $1999
- Better camera (94/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 54/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 2680
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 8358
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 11 points higher (86/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (83/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (84/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 3065623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 2910 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 9174 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 2184x1968 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 145 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 215 g | |
| Price | $661 | $1999 |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2184x1968
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 by 0.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1338. OPPO Reno 16 Pro is cheaper by $1338.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (94/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (83/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 54/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (84/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.