Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1999 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 75/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 3,065,623); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X200 Ultra has the stronger camera (167 vs 145); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is thinner (4.2mm vs 8.7mm).
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 215g vs 229g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 3065623
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 2910
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 9174
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper: $889 vs $1999
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 78/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 11 points higher (86/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (93/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (78/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (66/100 vs 34/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (84/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3065623 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2910 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9174 | 10095 | |
| Display | 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2184x1968 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 145 | 167 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 229 g | |
| Price | $1999 | $889 |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2184x1968
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 by 0.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1110. Vivo X200 Ultra is cheaper by $1110.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (93/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (78/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (66/100 vs 34/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (84/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.