Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $2899 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 69/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 2,926,532); the Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably lighter (229g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 229g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $2899
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (34/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 17 points higher (86/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (93/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (34/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 10095 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 5.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2010. Vivo X200 Ultra was $2010 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (89/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (93/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (34/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.