Google Pixel 8 vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro

The Google Pixel 8 (2023) runs on the Google Tensor G3, while the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; estimated prices are $699 and $661. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 68/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4575); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,443,431).

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 8 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 8
Performance 70
Display 82
Camera 79
Battery 44
Portability 57
Value for money 48
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 54
Value for money 84
What makes Google Pixel 8 better?

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 54/100)
What makes OPPO Reno 16 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1443431
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1722
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 4458
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4575 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 27W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 18W
  • Cheaper: $661 vs $699

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 79/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 48/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 8 vs the OPPO Reno 16 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 18 points higher (86/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 44/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (84/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8 (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Google Pixel 8 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8 (83/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 8 and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (57/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8 (84/100 vs 48/100).

Google Pixel 8: The Google Pixel 8 is a better fit for active users.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro: The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 8 OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Processor Google Tensor G3 MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
AnTuTu 1443431 3079298
Geekbench Single 1722 2680
Geekbench Multi 4458 8358
Display 6.2" OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 2772x1272
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4575 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 27W 80W
Wireless charging 18W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 148
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits 3600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 150.5×70.8×8.9 mm 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm
Weight 187 g
Price $699 $661
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 8
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
79
camera
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 8
  • 6.2" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 8
  • 4575 mAh
  • Wired: 27W
  • Wireless: 18W
44
battery
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 8 and OPPO Reno 16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3
68/100
1443431 AnTuTu
OPPO Reno 16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
86/100 +53.1%
3079298 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Google Pixel 8 by 53.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 8
$699
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
$661

Price difference: $38. OPPO Reno 16 Pro is cheaper by $38.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8 (89/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Google Pixel 8 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8 (94/100 vs 79/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8 (83/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 8 and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (57/100 vs 54/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8 (84/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 8 or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 8 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 8 and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The Google Pixel 8 has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 8 or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 79/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 8 or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 8 over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The Google Pixel 8 is a better fit for active users. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.