Google Pixel 8a vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro

The Google Pixel 8a (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G3, while the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; estimated prices are $499 and $661. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 65/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4492); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,433,693).

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a by 21 points (86/100 vs 65/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 8a
Performance 70
Display 82
Camera 70
Battery 39
Portability 57
Value for money 56
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 54
Value for money 84
What makes Google Pixel 8a better?
  • Cheaper: $499 vs $661

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 54/100)
What makes OPPO Reno 16 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1433693
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1722
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 4458
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4492 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 7W

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 8a vs the OPPO Reno 16 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 21 points higher (86/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (84/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Google Pixel 8a are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (83/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 8a and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (57/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (84/100 vs 56/100).

Google Pixel 8a: The Google Pixel 8a is a better fit for active users.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro: The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 8a OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Processor Google Tensor G3 MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
AnTuTu 1433693 3079298
Geekbench Single 1722 2680
Geekbench Multi 4458 8358
Display 6.1" OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 2772x1272
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4492 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 18W 80W
Wireless charging 7W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 136
Main camera 64 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits 3600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP67 IP68
Dimensions 152.1×72.7×8.9 mm 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm
Weight 188 g
Price $499 $661
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 8a
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.89
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 13MP
70
camera
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 8a
  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 8a
  • 4492 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • Wireless: 7W
39
battery
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 8a and OPPO Reno 16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3
65/100
1433693 AnTuTu
OPPO Reno 16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
86/100 +53.4%
3079298 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Google Pixel 8a by 53.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 8a
$499
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
$661

Price difference: $162. Google Pixel 8a is cheaper by $162.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (89/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Google Pixel 8a are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (94/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (83/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 8a and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (57/100 vs 54/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (84/100 vs 56/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 8a or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a by 21 points (86/100 vs 65/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 8a and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The Google Pixel 8a has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 8a or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 8a or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 8a over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The Google Pixel 8a is a better fit for active users. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.