Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; estimated prices are $1799 and $661. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 64/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,401,321); the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is thinner (5.1mm vs 8.2mm).
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Overall rating 64/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1401321
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 4516
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4650 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 21W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 7W
- Cheaper: $661 vs $1799
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 70/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 52/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 32/100)
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the OPPO Reno 16 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 22 points higher (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (84/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (83/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (84/100 vs 32/100).
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 1401321 | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1750 | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4516 | 8358 | |
| Display | 8.0" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2076x2152 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4650 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 21W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 7W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 129 | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2700 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 257 g | — | |
| Price | $1799 | $661 |
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 8.0" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2076x2152
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 4650 mAh
- Wired: 21W
- Wireless: 7W
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and OPPO Reno 16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 54.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1138. OPPO Reno 16 Pro is cheaper by $1138.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (89/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (83/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (84/100 vs 32/100).
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 22 points (86/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.