Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; estimated prices are $1799 and $661. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 61/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5015); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,553,009); the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is thinner (5.2mm vs 8.2mm).
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Overall rating 61/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1553009
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 2276
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 6173
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5015 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Cheaper: $661 vs $1799
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 52/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 26/100)
Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs the OPPO Reno 16 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 25 points higher (86/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 53/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (84/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (83/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (84/100 vs 26/100).
| Specification | Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 1553009 | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2276 | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6173 | 8358 | |
| Display | 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2152x2076 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5015 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.4×5.2 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 258 g | — | |
| Price | $1799 | $661 |
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2152x2076
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- 5015 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and OPPO Reno 16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by 49.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1138. OPPO Reno 16 Pro is cheaper by $1138.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (83/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (84/100 vs 26/100).
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by 25 points (86/100 vs 61/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.