Google Pixel 9 Pro vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro

The Google Pixel 9 Pro (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; estimated prices are $999 and $661. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 72/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,499,601).

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Performance 73
Display 88
Camera 80
Battery 50
Portability 54
Value for money 56
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 54
Value for money 84
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro better?

  • Better display (88/100 vs 84/100)
What makes OPPO Reno 16 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1499601
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1880
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 5100
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 37W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 23W
  • Cheaper: $661 vs $999

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 73/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 80/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro vs the OPPO Reno 16 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 14 points higher (86/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (84/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (89/100 vs 73/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (83/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100. In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (84/100 vs 56/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro: The Google Pixel 9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro: The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Processor Google Tensor G4 MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
AnTuTu 1499601 3079298
Geekbench Single 1880 2680
Geekbench Multi 5100 8358
Display 6.3" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2856x1280 2772x1272
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 37W 80W
Wireless charging 23W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 50 MP
Front camera 42 MP 50 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 3600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 152.8×72.0×8.5 mm 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm
Weight 199 g
Price $999 $661
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
80
camera
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro
  • 6.3" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2856x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 37W
  • Wireless: 23W
50
battery
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro and OPPO Reno 16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4
72/100
1499601 AnTuTu
OPPO Reno 16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
86/100 +51.3%
3079298 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Google Pixel 9 Pro by 51.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 9 Pro
$999
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
$661

Price difference: $338. OPPO Reno 16 Pro is cheaper by $338.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (89/100 vs 73/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (83/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100.

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (84/100 vs 56/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 80/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 73/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.