OPPO Find X9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The OPPO Find X9 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1199 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads — 78/100 vs 57/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Find X9 Pro has the bigger battery (6200 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Find X9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,508,681 vs 2,926,532); the OPPO Find X9 Pro is noticeably lighter (217g vs 309g).
OPPO Find X9 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Higher AnTuTu: 3508681 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10800 vs 9300
- Bigger battery: 6200 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 217g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $1199 vs $2899
- Higher performance (78/100 vs 67/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 49/100)
- Longer battery life (75/100 vs 52/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (28/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 2900
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 57/100
Comparing the OPPO Find X9 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the OPPO Find X9 Pro scores 21 points higher (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (78/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (93/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (75/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro is a bit better (78/100 vs 67/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (93/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (75/100 vs 52/100). In the "design" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (27/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3508681 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2900 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10800 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2780x1264 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6200 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 166 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / ColorOS 15.2 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.5×8.3 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 217 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $1199 | $2899 |
OPPO Find X9 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
OPPO Find X9 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2780x1264
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Find X9 Pro
- 6200 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 19:04 hrs, total 35:19 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared OPPO Find X9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Find X9 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 19.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1700. OPPO Find X9 Pro is cheaper by $1700.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro is a bit better (78/100 vs 67/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (93/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (75/100 vs 52/100).
design
In the "design" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (28/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (27/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 21 points (78/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Find X9 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro leads on camera score (93/100 vs 49/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro leads on performance (78/100 vs 67/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Find X9 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.