OPPO Find X9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26+

The OPPO Find X9 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; launch prices were $1199 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 70/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Find X9 Pro has the bigger battery (6200 mAh vs 4900); the OPPO Find X9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,508,681 vs 3,161,126); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is noticeably lighter (190g vs 217g).

The OPPO Find X9 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Find X9 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 93
Battery 83
Portability 46
Value for money 84

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Performance 91
Display 89
Camera 40
Battery 54
Portability 72
Value for money 50

What makes OPPO Find X9 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3508681 vs 3161126
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10800 vs 9200
  • Bigger battery: 6200 vs 4900 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 54/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26+ better?

  • Lighter: 190g vs 217g
  • Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1199

  • Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (72/100 vs 46/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Find X9 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy S26+, the OPPO Find X9 Pro scores 17 points higher (87/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (93/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (83/100 vs 54/100). Value score: OPPO Find X9 Pro — 84/100, Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (93/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (83/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the OPPO Find X9 Pro (72/100 vs 46/100).

OPPO Find X9 Pro: The OPPO Find X9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S26+: The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S26+
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Samsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTu 3508681 3161126
Geekbench Single 2900 2900
Geekbench Multi 10800 9200
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2780x1264 3120x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6200 mAh 4900 mAh
Charging 100W 45W
Wireless charging 50W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 166 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 10 MP
Front camera 32 MP 12 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 / ColorOS 15.2 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP68
Dimensions 161.3×76.5×8.3 mm 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm
Weight 217 g 190 g
Launch price $1199 $999

Camera comparison

OPPO Find X9 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
93
camera

Samsung Galaxy S26+

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
40
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Find X9 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2780x1264
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Samsung Galaxy S26+

  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Find X9 Pro

  • 6200 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 19:04 hrs, total 35:19 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Samsung Galaxy S26+

  • 4900 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
54
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Find X9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S26+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500
87/100
3508681 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600
70/100 -11.0%
3161126 AnTuTu

OPPO Find X9 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S26+ by 11.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Find X9 Pro

$1199

Samsung Galaxy S26+

$999

Launch price difference: $200. Samsung Galaxy S26+ was $200 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (93/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (83/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the OPPO Find X9 Pro (72/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The OPPO Find X9 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the OPPO Find X9 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The OPPO Find X9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 70/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The OPPO Find X9 Pro leads on camera score (93/100 vs 40/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Find X9 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The OPPO Find X9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.