OPPO Find X9s Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26+

The OPPO Find X9s Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; launch prices were $899 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Find X9s Pro leads — 88/100 vs 70/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Find X9s Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4900); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Find X9s Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,340,196 vs 3,161,830); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is thinner (7.3mm vs 8.4mm).

The OPPO Find X9s Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Find X9s Pro
Performance 93
Display 85
Camera 96
Battery 80
Portability 55
Value for money 88
Samsung Galaxy S26+
Performance 91
Display 89
Camera 40
Battery 54
Portability 72
Value for money 52
What makes OPPO Find X9s Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3340196 vs 3161830
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2900
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 9200
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4900 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $999

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26+ better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 198g

  • Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better portability (72/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Find X9s Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy S26+, the OPPO Find X9s Pro scores 18 points higher (88/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro leads (80/100 vs 54/100). Value score: OPPO Find X9s Pro — 88/100, Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 52/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the OPPO Find X9s Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (80/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the OPPO Find X9s Pro (72/100 vs 55/100).

OPPO Find X9s Pro: The OPPO Find X9s Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S26+: The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification OPPO Find X9s Pro Samsung Galaxy S26+
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Samsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTu 3340196 3161830
Geekbench Single 3228 2900
Geekbench Multi 9553 9200
Display 6.3" LTPS AMOLED 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1216x2640 3120x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 4900 mAh
Charging 80W 45W
Wireless charging 15W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 10 MP
Front camera 32 MP 12 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 150.3×71.7×8.4 mm 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm
Weight 198 g 190 g
Launch price $899 $999
Camera comparison
OPPO Find X9s Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Samsung Galaxy S26+
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
40
camera
Display comparison
OPPO Find X9s Pro
  • 6.3" LTPS AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Samsung Galaxy S26+
  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
OPPO Find X9s Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless charging: no data
80
battery
Samsung Galaxy S26+
  • 4900 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
54
battery
Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Find X9s Pro and Samsung Galaxy S26+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100
3340196 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600
70/100 -5.6%
3161830 AnTuTu

OPPO Find X9s Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S26+ by 5.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
OPPO Find X9s Pro
$899
Samsung Galaxy S26+
$999

Launch price difference: $100. OPPO Find X9s Pro was $100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the OPPO Find X9s Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (96/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9s Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (80/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the OPPO Find X9s Pro (72/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Find X9s Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The OPPO Find X9s Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the OPPO Find X9s Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The OPPO Find X9s Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 70/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Find X9s Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The OPPO Find X9s Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Find X9s Pro over the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The OPPO Find X9s Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.