Nubia Air vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Nubia Air (2025) runs on the Unisoc T8300, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $182 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 51/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 639,225); the Nubia Air is noticeably lighter (172g vs 309g).
Nubia Air
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 172g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $182 vs $2899
- Better display (83/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (90/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (70/100 vs 42/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 639225
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 880
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2073
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 46/100)
Comparing the Nubia Air vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 18 points higher (69/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nubia Air leads (70/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nubia Air (91/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Nubia Air is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nubia Air (52/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nubia Air (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Nubia Air significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nubia Air notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (70/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Nubia Air | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T8300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 639225 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 880 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2073 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×76.6×6.7 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 172 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $182 | $2899 |
Nubia Air
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Nubia Air
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nubia Air
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Nubia Air and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Nubia Air by 78.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2717. Nubia Air is cheaper by $2717.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nubia Air (91/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nubia Air is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nubia Air (52/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nubia Air (63/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nubia Air significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Nubia Air notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (70/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Air or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Nubia Air — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Nubia Air and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nubia Air has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Air or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Air or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Air over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nubia Air is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.