Nubia Air vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

The Nubia Air (2025) runs on the Unisoc T8300, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $182 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 34/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 639,225); the Nubia Air is noticeably lighter (172g vs 214g).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Air by 41 points (75/100 vs 34/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nubia Air
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 29
Battery 39
Design 85
Value for money 97
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Performance 84
Display 100
Camera 86
Battery 51
Design 32
Value for money 20
What makes Nubia Air better?
  • Lighter: 172g vs 214g
  • Cheaper: $182 vs $1299

  • Better design/ergonomics (85/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better value for money (97/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 639225
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 880
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 2073
  • Faster charging: 60W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (84/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 29/100)
  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nubia Air vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 41 points higher (75/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (51/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nubia Air leads (97/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Air (84/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Air (86/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Nubia Air significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (85/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nubia Air significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (97/100 vs 20/100).

Nubia Air: The Nubia Air is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Nubia Air Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Processor Unisoc T8300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 639225 3515964
Geekbench Single 880 3601
Geekbench Multi 2073 10686
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1224x2720 3120x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W 60W
Wireless charging 0W 25W
DXOMark (camera) 157
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 20 MP 12 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 164.2×76.6×6.7 mm 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm
Weight 172 g 214 g
Price $182 $1299
Camera comparison
Nubia Air
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
  • Front: 20MP
29
camera
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera
Display comparison
Nubia Air
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2720
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Nubia Air
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
39
battery
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
51
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nubia Air and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nubia Air Unisoc T8300
34/100
639225 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
75/100 +81.8%
3515964 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Nubia Air by 81.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nubia Air
$182
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
$1299

Price difference: $1117. Nubia Air is cheaper by $1117.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Air (84/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Air (86/100 vs 29/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Nubia Air significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (85/100 vs 32/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Nubia Air significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (97/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nubia Air or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Air by 41 points (75/100 vs 34/100).

What is the rating of the Nubia Air and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Nubia Air has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 75/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nubia Air or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 29/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nubia Air or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (84/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Nubia Air over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Nubia Air is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.