Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo X300
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1799 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 82/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 is faster in AnTuTu (3,330,801 vs 3,057,215); the Vivo X300 is noticeably lighter (206g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo X300
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Better camera (91/100 vs 78/100)
What makes Vivo X300 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3330801 vs 3057215
- Better Geekbench Single: 3352 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10402 vs 9119
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Lighter: 206g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $1799
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 90/100)
- Longer battery life (69/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo X300, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 1 points higher (83/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 78/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Vivo X300 — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (69/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 3330801 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 3352 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 10402 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 150.6×71.9×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 206 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $499 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300
- Main: 50MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo X300, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 leads Motorola Razr Fold by 8.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1300. Vivo X300 was $1300 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (69/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X300?
The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Vivo X300 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo X300?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X300 — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X300?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo X300?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.