Honor Magic7 Pro vs Vivo X300
The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1099 and $499. Both devices score the same overall rating of 82/100. Key differences: the Honor Magic7 Pro has the bigger battery (5270 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300 is faster in AnTuTu (3,330,801 vs 3,014,433); the Vivo X300 is noticeably lighter (206g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic7 Pro
Vivo X300
What makes Honor Magic7 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5270 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W
- Better camera (79/100 vs 78/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 69/100)
What makes Vivo X300 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3330801 vs 3014433
- Better Geekbench Single: 3352 vs 3057
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10402 vs 9302
- Lighter: 206g vs 223g
- Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $1099
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 91/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 36/100)
Comparison verdict
The Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X300 received the same MobileRank rating — 82/100. In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (80/100 vs 69/100). Value score: Honor Magic7 Pro — 74/100, Vivo X300 — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X300 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro is a bit better (80/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (55/100 vs 36/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Pro | Vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3014433 | 3330801 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3057 | 3352 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9302 | 10402 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5270 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 148 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm | 150.6×71.9×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 206 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $499 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300
- Main: 50MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 5270 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Vivo X300
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and Vivo X300, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 leads Honor Magic7 Pro by 9.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $600. Vivo X300 was $600 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X300 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro is a bit better (80/100 vs 69/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (55/100 vs 36/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Vivo X300?
Both devices scored 82/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo X300 (94/100 vs 91/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X300?
The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Vivo X300 — 82/100.
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the Vivo X300?
The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.