Honor Magic7 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 82/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5270); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,014,433); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 148).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic7 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic7 Pro better?
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W
- Lighter: 223g vs 230g
- Overall rating 82/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3014433
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3057
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9302
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5270 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $1099
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 79/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 80/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 36/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 9 points higher (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 79/100). Value score: Honor Magic7 Pro — 74/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (96/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3014433 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3057 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9302 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5270 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 148 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 5270 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic7 Pro by 29.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $149. Vivo X300 Ultra was $149 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (96/100 vs 79/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Honor Magic7 Pro by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 79/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 91/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.