Honor Magic7 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $899 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 83/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5850); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,351,429).
Honor Magic7 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W
- Lighter: 223g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $950
- Overall rating 83/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2351429
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5850 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 88/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 87/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 82/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 8 points higher (91/100 vs 83/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 88/100). Value score: Honor Magic7 Pro — 78/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 88/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 82/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2351429 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5850 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $950 |
Honor Magic7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 5850 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic7 Pro by 44.6% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $51. Honor Magic7 Pro was $51 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 88/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 82/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Honor Magic7 Pro by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 87/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 88/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.