Honor Robot Phone vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Robot Phone (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Both devices score the same overall rating of 91/100. Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,942,923).
Honor Robot Phone
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Better camera (100/100 vs 96/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3942923
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 98/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 72/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
The Honor Robot Phone and the Vivo X300 Ultra received the same MobileRank rating — 91/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Robot Phone are nearly equal (99/100 vs 98/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Robot Phone and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (100/100 vs 96/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 72/100).
| Specification | Honor Robot Phone | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | — | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 230 g | |
| Price | — | $10498 |
Honor Robot Phone
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Robot Phone
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Robot Phone
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor Robot Phone and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Robot Phone by 7.2% in our overall performance rating.
Honor Robot Phone
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Robot Phone are nearly equal (99/100 vs 98/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Robot Phone and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (100/100 vs 96/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 72/100).
Which is better: the Honor Robot Phone or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
Both devices scored 91/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo X300 Ultra.
What is the rating of the Honor Robot Phone and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Robot Phone has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Should you choose the Honor Robot Phone over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Robot Phone is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.