Honor Magic9 Super vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 87/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 7000); the Honor Magic9 Super is faster in AnTuTu (4,290,399 vs 4,247,433).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4290399 vs 4247433
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 7000 mAh
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 227g vs 230g
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (41/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Better camera (96/100 vs 78/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 Super vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 4 points higher (91/100 vs 87/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 99/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic9 Super and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (41/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic9 Super and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic9 Super leads Vivo X300 Ultra by 1.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic9 Super
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 99/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (96/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic9 Super and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (41/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Honor Magic9 Super by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 Super and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 Super over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.