Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Vivo X300

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1099 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 leads — 82/100 vs 77/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 is faster in AnTuTu (3,330,801 vs 3,126,402).

The Vivo X300 edges out the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Performance 91
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 61
Portability 68
Value for money 64

Vivo X300

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 78
Battery 69
Portability 55
Value for money 86

What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 206g

  • Better display (95/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 55/100)

What makes Vivo X300 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3330801 vs 3126402
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3352 vs 3013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10402 vs 9287
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (69/100 vs 61/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Vivo X300, the Vivo X300 scores 5 points higher (82/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 leads (78/100 vs 60/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — 64/100, Vivo X300 — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (78/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 is a bit better (69/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X300: The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Vivo X300
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3126402 3330801
Geekbench Single 3013 3352
Geekbench Multi 9287 10402
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 2800x1260
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 68W 80W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 14
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 150.6×71.9×8.0 mm
Weight 199 g 206 g
Launch price $1099 $499

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera

Vivo X300

  • Main: 50MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display

Vivo X300

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
61
battery

Vivo X300

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 40W
69
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Vivo X300, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
77/100
3126402 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +6.1%
3330801 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 leads Motorola Razr 70 Ultra by 6.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

$1099

Vivo X300

$499

Launch price difference: $600. Vivo X300 was $600 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (78/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 is a bit better (69/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo X300?

The Vivo X300 edges out the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Vivo X300?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo X300 — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo X300?

The Vivo X300 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Vivo X300?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.