Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X300
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1099 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 leads — 82/100 vs 76/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Vivo X300 is faster in AnTuTu (3,330,801 vs 2,962,094).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo X300
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 206g
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo X300 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3330801 vs 2962094
- Better Geekbench Single: 3352 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10402 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $1099
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (69/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo X300, the Vivo X300 scores 6 points higher (82/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 leads (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 leads (69/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Vivo X300 — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 is a bit better (69/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 3330801 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3352 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 10402 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 150.6×71.9×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 206 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $499 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300
- Main: 50MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo X300, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 11.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $600. Vivo X300 was $600 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (78/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 is a bit better (69/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X300?
The Vivo X300 edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo X300?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X300 — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X300?
The Vivo X300 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo X300?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.