Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Vivo X300
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1499 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 leads — 82/100 vs 78/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 3,330,801).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Vivo X300
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 3330801
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 206g
- Better display (95/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo X300 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3352 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10402 vs 9287
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $1499
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (69/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Vivo X300, the Vivo X300 scores 4 points higher (82/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 leads (78/100 vs 60/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Vivo X300 — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (78/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 is a bit better (69/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 3330801 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3352 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 10402 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 150.6×71.9×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 206 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $499 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300
- Main: 50MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Vivo X300, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Vivo X300 by 1.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1000. Vivo X300 was $1000 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (78/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 is a bit better (69/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo X300?
The Vivo X300 edges out the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Vivo X300?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo X300 — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo X300?
The Vivo X300 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Vivo X300?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.