Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1799 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 83/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 3,057,215); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X200 Ultra has the stronger camera (167 vs 164); the Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably lighter (229g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Better portability (52/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 3057215
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 9119
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Lighter: 229g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $1799
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 91/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 3 points higher (86/100 vs 83/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (52/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 10095 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Motorola Razr Fold by 1.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $910. Vivo X200 Ultra was $910 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (52/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra edges out the Motorola Razr Fold by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.