Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1799 and $889. Both devices score the same overall rating of 86/100. Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,092,340); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X200 Ultra has the stronger camera (167 vs 164); the Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably lighter (229g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3092340
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 10095
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 92/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 34/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Lighter: 229g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $889 vs $1799
- Better camera (93/100 vs 91/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 76/100)
The Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo X200 Ultra received the same MobileRank rating — 86/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (98/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (52/100 vs 34/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 10095 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 229 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $889 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Vivo X200 Ultra by 27.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $910. Vivo X200 Ultra is cheaper by $910.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (98/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (52/100 vs 34/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
Both devices scored 86/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Motorola Razr Fold.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 92/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.