Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1099 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 76/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 3,092,340); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 229g).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 3092340
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 229g
- Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 34/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Cheaper: $889 vs $1099
- Better camera (93/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 58/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 10 points higher (86/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (93/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (78/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (68/100 vs 34/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (84/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 10095 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 229 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $889 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Vivo X200 Ultra by 0.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $210. Vivo X200 Ultra is cheaper by $210.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (93/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (78/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (68/100 vs 34/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (84/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.