Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1099 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 76/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4700); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 2,962,094); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 229g
- Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 2962094
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $1099
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 10 points higher (86/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (93/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (78/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (68/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 10095 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 4.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $210. Vivo X200 Ultra was $210 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (93/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (78/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (68/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.