Motorola Signature vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $699 and $889. Both devices score the same overall rating of 86/100. Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5200); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 3,057,215); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X200 Ultra has the stronger camera (167 vs 164); the Motorola Signature is noticeably lighter (186g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Signature
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Motorola Signature better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 186g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $889
- Better portability (78/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 3057215
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 9119
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5200 mAh
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 91/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 77/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
The Motorola Signature and the Vivo X200 Ultra received the same MobileRank rating — 86/100. Value score: Motorola Signature — 86/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (78/100 vs 77/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (78/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Signature | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $699 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Signature
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Signature
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Signature
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Signature and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Motorola Signature by 1.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $190. Motorola Signature was $190 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (78/100 vs 77/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (78/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Signature or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
Both devices scored 86/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo X200 Ultra (92/100 vs 90/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Signature and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Signature over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.