Motorola Signature 27 vs Vivo X200 Ultra

The Motorola Signature 27 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature 27 leads — 92/100 vs 86/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Signature 27 is faster in AnTuTu (5,153,294 vs 3,092,340).

The Motorola Signature 27 edges out the Vivo X200 Ultra by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Signature 27

Performance 100
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 80
Portability —
Value for money —

Vivo X200 Ultra

Performance 92
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 78
Portability 34
Value for money 86

What makes Motorola Signature 27 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5153294 vs 3092340
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 3100
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 10095
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 92/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)

What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?


  • Better camera (93/100 vs 87/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Signature 27 vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Motorola Signature 27 scores 6 points higher (92/100 vs 86/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature 27 is a bit better (100/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Signature 27 is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 87/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature 27 and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (80/100 vs 78/100).

Motorola Signature 27: The Motorola Signature 27 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.
Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Signature 27 Vivo X200 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 5153294 3092340
Geekbench Single 4327 3100
Geekbench Multi 12873 10095
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1264x2780 3168x1440
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 90W 90W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 167
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 200 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 17 Android 15 / OriginOS 5
Brightness (peak) — 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68
Dimensions — 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight — 229 g
Launch price — $889

Camera comparison

Motorola Signature 27

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Vivo X200 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
93
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Signature 27

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1264x2780
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display

Vivo X200 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Signature 27

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery

Vivo X200 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
78
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Signature 27 and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Signature 27 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
92/100
5153294 AnTuTu
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 -66.6%
3092340 AnTuTu

Motorola Signature 27 leads Vivo X200 Ultra by 66.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Signature 27

Price unknown

Vivo X200 Ultra

$889

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature 27 is a bit better (100/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Signature 27 is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 87/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature 27 and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (80/100 vs 78/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Signature 27 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Motorola Signature 27 edges out the Vivo X200 Ultra by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Signature 27 and the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Motorola Signature 27 has a MobileRank rating of 92/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Signature 27 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 87/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Signature 27 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Motorola Signature 27 leads on performance (100/100 vs 92/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Signature 27 over the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Motorola Signature 27 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.