Honor Magic8 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Honor Magic8 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $899 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic8 Pro leads — 89/100 vs 86/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5850); the Honor Magic8 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,966,144 vs 3,092,340); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X200 Ultra has the stronger camera (167 vs 164); the Honor Magic8 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic8 Pro
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic8 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3966144 vs 3092340
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10095
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W
- Lighter: 199g vs 229g
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 92/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (56/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5850 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $899
- Better camera (93/100 vs 91/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic8 Pro vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Honor Magic8 Pro scores 3 points higher (89/100 vs 86/100). Value score: Honor Magic8 Pro — 90/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro is a bit better (98/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Honor Magic8 Pro are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (82/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (56/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic8 Pro | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3966144 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1260 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5850 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.0×8.3 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic8 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic8 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic8 Pro
- 5850 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic8 Pro and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic8 Pro leads Vivo X200 Ultra by 28.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $10. Vivo X200 Ultra was $10 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro is a bit better (98/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Honor Magic8 Pro are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (82/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (56/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic8 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor Magic8 Pro edges out the Vivo X200 Ultra by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic8 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor Magic8 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic8 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor Magic8 Pro leads on performance (98/100 vs 92/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic8 Pro over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor Magic8 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.