Honor Magic8 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Honor Magic8 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $899 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic8 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 86/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5850); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 3,023,211); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X200 Ultra has the stronger camera (167 vs 164); the Honor Magic8 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic8 Pro
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic8 Pro better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10095
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W
- Lighter: 199g vs 229g
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 92/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (56/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 3023211
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5850 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $899
- Better camera (93/100 vs 91/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic8 Pro vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Honor Magic8 Pro scores 1 points higher (87/100 vs 86/100). Value score: Honor Magic8 Pro — 86/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Honor Magic8 Pro are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (82/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (56/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic8 Pro | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3023211 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1260 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5850 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.0×8.3 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic8 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic8 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic8 Pro
- 5850 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic8 Pro and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Honor Magic8 Pro by 2.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $10. Vivo X200 Ultra was $10 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Honor Magic8 Pro are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (82/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (56/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic8 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor Magic8 Pro edges out the Vivo X200 Ultra by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic8 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor Magic8 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Should you choose the Honor Magic8 Pro over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor Magic8 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.