Motorola Razr Fold vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro; launch prices were $1799 and $249. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 86/100 vs 52/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 884,207); the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite is noticeably lighter (199g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 884207
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2813
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
- Lighter: 199g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $1799
- Better portability (56/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 34 points higher (86/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (71/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 76/100, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite — 58/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (91/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (71/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 884207 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 2813 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2392x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 164.0×78.0×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $249 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Nothing Phone (3a) Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Nothing Phone (3a) Lite by 345.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1550. Nothing Phone (3a) Lite was $1550 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (98/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (91/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (71/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite by 34 points (86/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite — 52/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Nothing Phone (3a) Lite is a better fit for everyday use.